Visualizing History
Over the summer I had some time to spend thinking and reading about topics that sparked my interest during grad school. Part of that happened to be a new interest in history. I never really liked general world history during high school or college, but the prospect of designing things for the future made me intensely interested in the past and how we’ve come to the present. After all, design research is digging into past experiences of people’s lives. If you scale it up to past trends and ideologies you get a better idea of the current momentum of the world.
One of the first thoughts I had about history was how difficult it was to truly understand the time spans that are referenced. Hundreds, thousands, and millions of years are not easy to get a gist of. There’s a certain subset of time that we can truly relate to–probably between several seconds and year or two. Anything else is just a mental representation of what we are dealing with.
In any case, I think historical timelines area really inadequet, and instead of years they should use something that we can understand a little better on an intuitive level. We can understand human generations pretty well, and have a natural sense of the time involved in a person’s liftime in relation to their children’s, and it would be nice to show historical events in those terms.
Luckily, I found someone else who had the same idea:
Dan Roam is some sort of visualizer extraordinaire. He put out a book, and visited Carnegie Mellon while I was there–sadly I wasn’t able to make it to his talk. His work looks interesting, but I’m not sure about the whole napkin think. I think the idea is that it’s important to recognize that visualizing is useful even in extremely low fidelity. The value really comes in communicating an idea, making something understandable, and ultimately being a tool for stimulating discussion.
Hey Imran, that’s pretty much what my thesis paper is going to be about – the role of visualization in conversation to change organizations. That’s a lot of “ations” I know.
I’d love to hear more about the paper, sources you’re using, and eventually read the final thing when it’s complete
I’m also curious about how things went at 2nd Road…
Hey Imran. Neat post. I really like the visualization Dan Roam did. Also interesting how he chose the people he chose … Out of all the people he could have chosen to contextualize history he chose ~8 people. Wonder what that means. Everyone else is an in-betweener. Wonder who the next orange person is going to be … Does it also mean there hasn’t really been a significant person since Columbus? Hehe.
What is the book you were looking into that deals with “places”?
Yeah, the information we choose to call out in visualizations builds the story we are trying to tell. My guess is that these are people that he sees as being the most influential on today’s society.
In terms of Space and Place, the book Space and Place is a great primer on how we experience our surroundings.